Quality diagnostic

Data Quality Diagnostic

Find the conditions that make a workflow hard to trust, reuse, or expose to controlled AI use.

Deterministic corePublic alphaPDF export

Design stance

Deterministic scoring, readable outputs, and explicit limits.

Logic

Primary-literature-grounded, deterministic scoring with explicit blockers and rationale.

Output

Readable reports, stronger charts, and artifacts that hold up in planning and review.

Two areas

DQ is the fuller six-dimension diagnostic. Readiness Check is the shorter workflow snapshot.

DQ

Data Quality Diagnostic

Active area

Diagnose the operating dimensions that determine whether a workflow can be trusted, reused, and prepared for controlled AI use.

Use the Data Quality Diagnostic when you need the fuller diagnosis first: where trust breaks, where structure collapses, and what to fix next.

View current areaFull diagnostic

RC

Readiness Check

Open area

Estimate the current workflow condition and show what still blocks dependable reuse.

Use the Readiness Check when you need a shorter first-pass snapshot with explicit capability gaps.

Open Readiness CheckQuick view

What DQ produces

A detailed workflow diagnosis, not a vague headline score

Severity across six diagnostic dimensions
Three highest-pressure dimensions ranked by impact on trust and decision speed
Current workflow state plus explicit capability gaps
Near-term action plan and a scoped follow-on move

When to use it

Use DQ when the work is messy, political, or slow.

Choose DQ when a team keeps losing time to metric disputes, recoding, inconsistent judgement, or weak AI readiness.

What changes after the report

You leave with a concrete next move.

The report is built to support a near-term operating decision, a stakeholder review, or a scoped follow-on effort, not just a score reveal.